The parties separated after a short marriage.
The applicant wife had purchased the matrimonial home primarily with her own funds prior to the marriage.
Following separation, the respondent husband surreptitiously purchased the home through a numbered company and later transferred it to his sister for no consideration to defeat the applicant's claims.
The court ordered an unequal division of net family property in favour of the applicant due to the short duration of the marriage and her disproportionate financial contributions.
The court imputed income to the respondent for the purposes of child and spousal support due to his failure to provide adequate financial disclosure.
The court also set aside the transfer of the home to the respondent's sister as a fraudulent conveyance, but dismissed the applicant's claims for the tort of conspiracy and a vesting order.
