L. E. Fryer, J.

The parties separated after a short marriage.

The applicant wife had purchased the matrimonial home primarily with her own funds prior to the marriage.

Following separation, the respondent husband surreptitiously purchased the home through a numbered company and later transferred it to his sister for no consideration to defeat the applicant's claims.

The court ordered an unequal division of net family property in favour of the applicant due to the short duration of the marriage and her disproportionate financial contributions.

The court imputed income to the respondent for the purposes of child and spousal support due to his failure to provide adequate financial disclosure.

The court also set aside the transfer of the home to the respondent's sister as a fraudulent conveyance, but dismissed the applicant's claims for the tort of conspiracy and a vesting order.

The local children's aid society brought a motion to transfer a child protection proceeding to the Toronto children's aid society under s. 91(3) of the CYFSA.

The parents had a long history of family law litigation in Toronto, and the Toronto agency had extensive prior involvement investigating repeated, unverified allegations of sexual abuse raised by the mother.

The court found that the preponderance of convenience and the child's best interests favoured transferring the matter to Toronto, as the Toronto agency and courts were more familiar with the family's history of high conflict and coaching concerns.

The father applied for a protective separation and sole decision-making authority to repair his relationship with his two children, alleging parental alienation by the mother.

The court found that the mother had engaged in alienating behaviours and failed to authentically support the children's relationship with their father.

The court ordered a 90-day protective separation during which the children will reside solely with the father and have no contact with the mother.

The father and children were ordered to participate in the Turning Points for Families intensive reunification program.

The mother's claim for unjust enrichment regarding the jointly owned home was dismissed, and various financial and child support orders were made.