Niki Dwyer

The appellants appealed the Town of Carleton Place's extension of an interim control by-law.

The parties reached a settlement to remove the appellants' property from the application of the extended by-law.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence that the amendment was consistent with provincial policy and conformed to the official plan, the Tribunal approved the settlement and allowed the appeal in part.

The appellant appealed the Town's refusal of a Class III Development Permit Application to construct six street-facing townhouses.

Prior to the merit hearing, the parties reached a settlement that addressed the Town Committee's compatibility concerns by increasing the exterior side yard setback and requiring tree planting.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the settlement proposal was consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, conformed to the applicable official plans and by-laws, and represented good land use planning.

The appeal was allowed in part to issue the permit subject to the agreed conditions.

The appellant appealed the Town of Carleton Place's Interim Control By-law No. 99-2023, which affected its conditionally approved development permit for a residential and commercial building.

At a settlement hearing, the parties presented a settlement to remove the subject lands from the by-law's 'Strategic Properties' designation and extend the time to satisfy development conditions.

Relying on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal approved the settlement, finding it consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and good land use planning.