Following a family trial, the court resolved remaining issues concerning parenting decision-making, section 7 expenses, child support, the date of separation, and equalization.
The court granted the mother sole decision-making authority over extra-curricular activities, found the father’s opposition to dance classes unreasonable, and ordered section 7 expenses shared in a 5:6 ratio.
For child support, the court imputed annual income of $120,000 to the father from June 1, 2021, finding both that his true earning capacity exceeded his reported income and that he was intentionally underemployed within the meaning of the Guidelines.
On property issues, the court fixed the separation date at January 14, 2021 and valued the applicant’s Dreamfund investments at zero on that date, concluding an objective observer would have regarded them as worthless despite later sporadic payments.
