The appellant appealed a trial judgment settling the division of matrimonial property following a marriage breakdown.
The central issue was whether the respondent was a beneficial owner of the matrimonial home held solely in the appellant's name.
The trial judge found the respondent was a beneficial owner based on the parties' pattern of joint financial ventures in real estate.
The appellant argued the trial judge erred in finding beneficial ownership, in denying an adjournment request, in failing to assist her as a self-represented litigant, and in refusing an unequal division of net family property.
The appeal was dismissed on all grounds.
