The accused, Rosemary Levett, was charged with administering a noxious substance (Zopiclone) to Nora Wara, intending to aggrieve or annoy her, contrary to subsection 245(b) of the Criminal Code.
The central issue was whether the Zopiclone tablet was ingested by the complainant and, if so, whether the accused administered it.
The Crown's case relied entirely on the complainant's testimony.
The court found numerous inconsistencies and incongruities in the complainant's narrative, including conflicting statements about her motives, her actions regarding evidence preservation, and her general credibility.
The court was not confident in the complainant's sincerity and found that the Crown had not displaced the presumption of innocence.
The accused was acquitted.