This decision addresses two evidentiary motions brought at the commencement of the third trial in a motor vehicle accident case.
The defendant municipalities sought leave to call an additional expert witness despite non-compliance with a court-ordered deadline and to admit an excerpt from "The Driver's Handbook" as filed evidence.
The court granted leave for the expert to testify, balancing the need for court orders to have "teeth" against the interests of justice and the opposing party's ability to respond without undue delay.
However, the court dismissed the motion to admit the handbook excerpt directly, suggesting it could be introduced through expert testimony instead.