The accused was charged with impaired driving and operating a motor vehicle with more than 80 mg of alcohol in 100 ml of blood following a single-vehicle collision.
The accused denied being the driver and claimed Charter violations regarding the right to counsel and unreasonable search and seizure.
The court found the accused was the driver based on credible eyewitness evidence and physical evidence from the collision.
No Charter violations were found.
The court concluded the accused's ability to operate the vehicle was impaired by alcohol and her blood alcohol concentration exceeded the legal limit at the time of the collision.
