The applicant, the wife of an incapacitated man, sought appointment as guardian of his person and property.
The respondents, the incapacitated man's siblings and mother, opposed the application and sought to have one of the siblings appointed as guardian instead.
The court found that the applicant and her daughter were in a closer relationship with the incapacitated person than his siblings, and that the sibling proposed as guardian had a conflict of interest regarding disputed property ownership.
The court appointed the applicant and her daughter as joint guardians.
