In an appeal from a guardianship order, family members challenged the application judge’s appointment of the incapable person’s wife and adult daughter as guardians of property and personal care.
The appellants argued that the judge mishandled the evidence, ignored material arguments, engaged in uneven scrutiny, and made improper procedural rulings.
The Court of Appeal held that the arguments merely sought a reweighing of the record, which is not the appellate role, and found no reversible error.
The appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the respondents.
