Following conviction for criminal harassment and before disposition, the court addressed serious concerns about the accused's mental health and criminal responsibility.
After an earlier assessment order failed to yield the mandatory written report, the court held that the statutory requirements under ss. 672.11 and 672.2 of the Criminal Code had not been met.
Relying on forensic psychiatric evidence, the court concluded that a fulsome inpatient assessment was necessary to determine criminal responsibility and to inform a fair and safe sentencing disposition.
A fresh 60-day assessment order was issued, with detailed directions and prompt transport to the psychiatric facility.
