2 total
Respondent found in contempt for failing to disclose financials; refraining order granted on strict payment conditions.
The applicant and respondent brought cross-motions in a family law proceeding.
The respondent sought a stay of support enforcement, a refraining order against the suspension of his driver's licence, and exclusive possession of the matrimonial home.
The applicant sought to strike the respondent's pleadings and a finding of contempt for his ongoing failure to comply with financial disclosure orders.
The court dismissed the respondent's motions for a stay and exclusive possession, finding he lacked clean hands and failed to establish a prima facie case for variation.
A refraining order was granted on the condition that the respondent pay current support and $1,000 monthly towards arrears.
The court declined to strike the respondent's pleadings to allow him to participate at trial, but found him in civil contempt for wilful non-disclosure, granting him a final opportunity to purge the contempt before sentencing.
Board lacks jurisdiction over work assignment dispute where collective agreements require referral to mutually selected tribunal.
The Board heard a jurisdictional dispute complaint and a related construction industry grievance regarding a work assignment.
The employer had assigned certain work to the Millwrights, and the IBEW filed a grievance.
The Board found that the collective agreements of both unions contained provisions requiring work assignment disputes to be referred to the Plan for Settlement of Jurisdictional Disputes in the Construction Industry.
Consequently, the Board dismissed the grievance as it was not arbitrable under the agreement, and dismissed the jurisdictional dispute complaint pursuant to section 91(14) of the Labour Relations Act for lack of jurisdiction.
