The appellant, Kevin Jex, sought leave to bring an eighth motion to extend the time to perfect his appeal from the dismissal of his action for damages following a motor vehicle accident.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the motion, finding that Jex had not demonstrated a continuing intention to proceed, had unreasonably refused to obtain necessary transcripts despite multiple indulgences, and had engaged in frivolous, vexatious, and abusive conduct, including misleading the court and harassing the court reporter.
The court concluded that granting further extensions would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.