2 total
Court clarifies prior costs endorsement covered all costs, including costs thrown away.
The plaintiffs sought clarification of a prior costs endorsement issued following an adjournment request on a motion.
The court reviewed the earlier endorsement and clarified that the costs award of $1,250 plus HST was intended to cover both the costs thrown away and the disposition of relief sought in specific paragraphs of the notice of motion.
The judge confirmed that the order was not intended to award $1,250 plus an additional amount for costs thrown away.
No further appointment was required to resolve the issue.
Appeal dismissed; insurer had no duty to defend contractor for foundation settlement not constituting an accident.
The appellants appealed a Master's decision granting summary judgment to the third-party insurer, striking the appellants' third-party claim.
The Master concluded that the plaintiff's claim against the appellants fell outside the insuring agreement because the appellants were acting as a general contractor rather than a building material wholesaler, and the damages did not result from an accident.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the allegations clearly related to the appellants' activities as a contractor and that foundation settlement due to inadequate soil conditions could not reasonably be characterized as an accident.
