The defendants, T-Bay Movers Corporation and Konrad Kuhne, moved for partial summary judgment on their counterclaim against the plaintiff, Sean Bouttell, seeking specific performance of a "Second Contract" to unwind a previous share purchase agreement.
The plaintiff argued that the email exchanges did not constitute a binding contract and raised issues of illegality and non-compliance with the Ontario Business Corporations Act.
The court found that the email exchanges clearly evidenced a meeting of the minds, forming a binding "Second Contract." The plaintiff's arguments regarding the conditional nature of the agreement and illegality were rejected due to lack of credible evidence.
The court granted specific performance to the defendants, dismissing the plaintiff's statement of claim in its entirety, as it was premised on the non-existence of the "Second Contract."