The appellant property owners association appealed the dismissal of its action in proprietary estoppel, claiming it had acquired an easement over a City-owned water lot where it had installed seasonal docks for decades.
The trial judge found that the City's 1956 policy permitting the dock was not contractual and the City never made an unambiguous promise not to revoke it.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error in the trial judge's conclusion that the requirements for proprietary estoppel were not met.
