The appellant insurer appealed the dismissal of its summary judgment motion regarding uninsured automobile coverage.
The respondent argued the Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction because the order was interlocutory, not final.
The Court of Appeal agreed, holding that unless a motion judge explicitly invokes Rule 20.04(4) to make a binding determination of law, an order dismissing summary judgment is presumed interlocutory.
The appeal was quashed for lack of jurisdiction.
