A lessor of vehicles sought to establish that it was entitled to third-party liability insurance coverage under an automobile insurance policy issued by the respondent insurer.
The dispute centered on whether an OPCF 5 endorsement, which permits lessors to lease vehicles and provides coverage to both lessors and lessees, was part of the Certificate of Automobile Insurance.
The application judge found the endorsement was not part of the policy.
The Court of Appeal reversed, finding that the Certificate contained the phrase "AS PER OPCF 5 FORMS" which the insurer had added to its standard form, and that this language, combined with the commercial context of the transaction, demonstrated the insurer's intent to provide liability coverage to both the lessor and lessee.