Bruce Kelly

The defendants, a licensed service provider and its owner, brought a motion to strike the plaintiff employee's statement of claim.

The plaintiff alleged she was assaulted by a minor resident at the defendants' group home and claimed damages for negligence, breach of contract, and breach of the Occupiers' Liability Act.

The defendants argued they owed no duty of care to the plaintiff because their paramount statutory duty was to the child.

The court dismissed the motion, finding it was not plain and obvious that the employer owed no common law duty of care to provide a safe workplace for its employee, and that such a duty would not necessarily conflict with its statutory duty to the child.

The court determined costs arising from four similar insurance motions brought by separate defendants in related actions.

The plaintiffs sought partial indemnity costs of $36,500.

The court found that a deduction was required because some counsel time related to unargued Charter applications rather than the motions themselves.

Applying the principles from Hunt v. TD Securities Inc., the court declined to award substantial indemnity costs and instead reduced the requested amount by $8,000.

The plaintiffs were awarded $28,500 plus HST, payable equally among the defendants.

The plaintiffs, injured in motor vehicle accidents, applied for mediation through the Financial Services Commission of Ontario regarding entitlement to statutory accident benefits.

Mediation was not scheduled within 60 days of filing their applications, and the regulator refused to issue reports declaring mediation had failed, asserting the 60‑day period began only once a mediator was appointed.

The plaintiffs commenced court actions and the insurers moved to strike the claims for lack of jurisdiction.

The court held that Rule 19 of the Dispute Resolution Practice Code imposes a mandatory requirement that mediation be concluded within 60 days of filing the mediation application.

Because that period had expired, mediation was deemed to have failed and the plaintiffs were not required to obtain a failed mediation report or pursue internal appeals or judicial review before commencing their actions.