The respondent wife brought a motion for interim spousal support, retroactive support, and security for support.
The parties separated after a 15-year marriage with no children, and there was a significant income disparity between them.
The court found the wife had a needs-based entitlement to support but declined to base the quantum on the husband's anomalous 2020 income or to order a 50/50 net disposable income split.
The court imputed an income of $60,000 to the wife and based the husband's income on his 2019 earnings of $280,000, ordering interim spousal support of $5,000 per month retroactive to the date of notice.
Claims for further retroactive support were dismissed as premature pending full financial disclosure.