Who is Brennan Matthew Carroll?

Brennan Matthew Carroll is an Ontario lawyer (In Private Practice) with 2 court cases on record from 2012 to 2015.

What courts has Brennan Matthew Carroll appeared in?

Brennan Matthew Carroll has appeared in Court of Justice.

How many cases has Brennan Matthew Carroll handled?

Brennan Matthew Carroll has 2 cases on record from 2012 to 2015.

What judges has Brennan Matthew Carroll appeared before?

Brennan Matthew Carroll has most frequently appeared before Justice David M. Paciocco.

Brennan Matthew Carroll | Lawyer | Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

2 total

R. v. Clarke, 2015 ONCJ 303

The accused was charged with three offences arising from a motor vehicle accident on October 9, 2012: failing to stop after being involved in an accident knowing bodily harm was caused, impaired driving causing bodily harm, and operating a motor vehicle with more than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood while causing an accident resulting in bodily harm.

The court found that the accused's vehicle struck a cyclist, causing serious injury.

The Crown's case was significantly weakened by Charter breaches committed by police during the accused's detention, resulting in the exclusion of breath samples and statements.

The court convicted the accused of impaired driving causing bodily harm but acquitted on the other two counts, finding reasonable doubt regarding whether the accused knew or was wilfully blind to having struck a person.

ONCJJun 1, 2015

Respondent Counsel

R. v. Edwards; R. v. Pino, 2012 ONCJ 422

Two accused were charged with drug offences arising from a police investigation of a suspected marijuana grow operation at 21 St. Clair Avenue in Ottawa on June 25, 2010.

Eneida Pino was charged with possession of cannabis marijuana for the purpose of trafficking.

Randall Scott Edwards was charged with possession of cannabis marijuana for the purpose of trafficking and unlawfully producing cannabis marijuana.

The Crown alleged that Pino removed a box containing 50 marijuana clone plants from the residence and placed it in her vehicle.

Edwards was found inside the residence during the execution of a search warrant.

Pino claimed she believed the box contained groceries and was unaware of its contents.

Edwards' defence was that the Crown failed to prove he was party to the grow operation enterprise or in possession of the marijuana.

The court found Pino guilty as charged, rejecting her testimony as incredible and finding she had knowledge and control of the marijuana for trafficking purposes.

The court acquitted Edwards, finding insufficient evidence to prove he exercised control over the grow operation or possessed the marijuana beyond a reasonable doubt.

Respondent Counsel

2

total cases