The appellant was convicted of numerous firearms offences after police found stolen guns in his storage locker.
The search warrant was based on an Information to Obtain (ITO) relying on a confidential informant.
At trial, the Crown provided a judicial summary of the redacted ITO under step six of Garofoli, which the trial judge found adequate.
On appeal, the appellant sought to challenge the constitutionality of step six of Garofoli for the first time and argued the summary was inadequate.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, refusing to hear the new constitutional argument and upholding the adequacy of the summary.
The sentence appeal was allowed only to grant enhanced credit for pre-trial custody at a rate of 1.5:1, reducing the net sentence to eight years and one month.
