The moving party municipality sought leave to appeal a motion judge's dismissal of its motions for summary judgment and determination of a question of law.
The underlying action involved claims of misfeasance and negligence related to the closing of zoning applications.
The Divisional Court granted leave to appeal on the issue of whether the municipality was immune from suit under s. 20(1)(a) of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act, finding there was good reason to doubt the correctness of the motion judge's decision and that the issue was of general importance.
Leave to appeal on the limitation period issue was denied.
