6 total
Interim supervised access ordered for father amidst conflicting allegations of abuse and parental alienation.
The moving party father brought motions for parenting time and reunification therapy after his access to the child was cut off following criminal charges against him, which were later withdrawn.
The responding party mother alleged the father had sexually abused the child, though no charges were laid against him for those allegations.
The court ordered interim supervised access for the father but declined to order reunification therapy on an interim motion, noting the lack of an independent report and specific details for a therapy plan.
The court granted summary judgment for Crown wardship without parental access, finding the parents incapable of providing safe care.
A child protection case involving two young children apprehended at birth due to parental neglect, domestic violence, and unsafe living conditions.
The Children's Aid Society sought a Crown wardship order.
The parents opposed this, with the mother seeking return of the children under supervision and the father proposing placement with his mother and sister.
Following a mini-trial to address genuine issues regarding parenting capacity, the court granted Crown wardship without access to the biological parents, finding that the children's best interests were served by permanent placement for adoption with their foster parents.
Mother's appeal of summary judgment granting Crown wardship without access dismissed due to severe intellectual limitations.
The appellant mother appealed a summary judgment order making her youngest child a Crown ward without access.
The child had been apprehended at birth.
A parenting capacity assessment concluded there was a serious risk of neglectful parenting due to the mother's severe intellectual limitations and personality traits, despite her commitment and efforts to improve.
The appeal court found no palpable and overriding error in the motion judge's findings that the child was in need of protection, that supervision was unworkable, and that access would not be meaningful or beneficial to the child.
The appeal was dismissed.
The court ordered a mini-trial to hear oral evidence from a psychologist regarding a parenting capacity assessment before deciding a summary judgment motion for Crown wardship.
This is a child protection case under Part III of the Child and Family Services Act involving two young children apprehended at birth due to deplorable living conditions, lack of prenatal care, domestic violence, and parental capacity concerns.
The Children's Aid Society sought Crown wardship with no access for adoption purposes.
The parents sought return of the children to the mother's care, with the father seeking alternative return to his care.
The court found that a parenting capacity assessment report constituted a genuine issue requiring trial determination and ordered a "mini-trial" under Rule 16(6.2) of the Family Law Rules to hear evidence from the psychologist and the parents before deciding whether a full trial was necessary.
Interim support ordered and compliance with disclosure and appraisal deadlines enforced.
The applicant spouse brought a motion seeking interim spousal and child support, enforcement of a prior case conference order requiring financial disclosure and property appraisal, and potential sale of the matrimonial home.
The court declined to determine retroactive spousal support on the limited record but ordered prospective interim spousal support based on the respondent’s estimated reduced income from a new business venture.
Child support was ordered for one child whom the respondent had treated as his own despite not being the biological parent, while entitlement for another child was left contingent on proof of full-time educational attendance.
The court also ordered compliance timelines for financial disclosure, confirmation of insurance beneficiary designation, appraisal of the matrimonial home, and confirmation of health benefits coverage.
Summary judgment for Crown Wardship granted on appeal; motion judge erred by giving mother a 'last chance'.
The father appealed and the Children's Aid Society cross-appealed a motion judge's decision on a summary judgment motion for Crown Wardship.
The motion judge had found a triable issue regarding the mother but effectively granted summary judgment against the father, limiting his participation at trial.
On appeal, the Superior Court found the motion judge erred in law by failing to properly apply the summary judgment test, instead dismissing the motion to give the mother a 'last chance' to improve her parenting.
The court allowed the Society's cross-appeal, set aside the motion judge's decision, and granted summary judgment for Crown Wardship without access to either parent.