The applicant, an eight-year-old boy with disabilities, sought an interim remedy to compel the respondent school board to immediately transition him to a full-time grade three program with specific accommodations, rather than the one hour per day currently offered.
The Tribunal granted the request to expedite the proceedings due to the urgency of the child's educational situation and the risk of developmental regression.
However, the Tribunal dismissed the request for an interim remedy, finding that the expert evidence provided did not establish that a rapid transition to full-time schooling was in the applicant's best interests or would effectively accommodate his disabilities.