The appellant appealed a trial decision ordering him to pay child support based on an imputed income of $75,000 and dismissing his claim for equalization of net family property.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error.
The trial judge's decision to impute income was justified by the appellant's deliberate failure to make financial disclosure, intentional underemployment, and manipulation of documents.
The dismissal of the equalization claim was upheld based on the trial judge's finding that the parties had already settled property division in 2011.
