The appellant mother appealed a summary judgment order finding her nine-year-old child in need of protection and granting Crown wardship with access.
The child had been apprehended five times due to the mother's serious mental health decompensations and lack of a viable safety plan.
The Divisional Court upheld the motions judge's finding that the predictable interruptions in care caused a risk of emotional harm to the child.
Finding no reviewable errors of fact or law, the court dismissed the appeal.
