4 total
Appeals allowed in part to approve a settlement permitting a residential subdivision development in Brampton.
The applicant appealed the City of Brampton's failure to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision to permit a residential development.
Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.
Based on the uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed instruments were consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, conformed to the applicable Growth Plan and Official Plans, and represented good planning.
The appeals were allowed in part to approve the settlement.
Tribunal schedules third Case Management Conference to allow City to obtain instructions on development applications.
The Ontario Land Tribunal held a second Case Management Conference regarding appeals by Georgian Mayfield Inc. against the City of Brampton for failing to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision.
The City requested a third CMC to obtain instructions from City Council.
The Tribunal scheduled a third CMC and directed the parties to submit a draft Procedural Order and Issues List or a settlement document prior to the next appearance.
Second CMC scheduled for appeals regarding municipality's failure to decide on residential development planning applications.
The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding appeals by the applicant against the municipality for failing to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision within the statutory timeframes.
The applications seek to permit a residential development with 107 units.
The Tribunal scheduled a second CMC and directed the parties to submit a draft Procedural Order and Issues List.
Motion for stay of Ontario Municipal Board hearing pending leave to appeal dismissed.
The moving party sought a stay of an Ontario Municipal Board hearing pending a motion for leave to appeal the Board's decision dismissing its motion to remove the responding parties' lawyers of record due to an alleged conflict of interest.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion for a stay, finding that the moving party failed to establish a serious issue to be tried, irreparable harm, or that the balance of convenience favoured a stay.
