The applicant father brought a motion for increased interim parenting time with his six-year-old child, seeking additional overnights, earlier pick-up times, and extended summer access.
The respondent mother opposed any changes, arguing the status quo should be maintained until trial and that the father's proposed schedule would require a 45-minute commute to school.
The court rejected the mother's argument that changes must be deferred to trial, finding no need to prove urgency or a material change in circumstances for an interim order.
The court granted the father a Tuesday overnight, earlier pick-up times, extended time for PA days and statutory holidays, and additional summer weeks, but denied a Sunday overnight to avoid excessive commuting for the child.
