The defendants brought a summary judgment motion seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's claim based on the expiry of the two-year limitation period under the Limitations Act, 2002.
The plaintiff argued the limitation period had not expired or, in the alternative, that there were genuine issues requiring a trial.
The court found that the plaintiff's decision to forebear from suing earlier, based on promises of payment and a long-standing business relationship, was reasonable.
The court also determined that there were serious credibility issues and disputed facts regarding the nature of the contracts and payments, making it impossible to dispose of the matter summarily.
The motion for summary judgment was dismissed, requiring a full trial on the merits.