Anne Gottlieb

The applicant brought a request for records before the Condominium Authority Tribunal.

The parties settled the matter during the Stage 2 process.

The Tribunal issued a consent order closing the file and ordering the respondent to pay the applicant $75.00 for Tribunal filing fees.

The applicant unit owner submitted a request for records to the respondent condominium corporation.

The corporation failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period using the prescribed form and refused to provide several core records, citing privacy concerns and pandemic-related delays.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal found that the applicant was entitled to the requested records and that the corporation lacked a reasonable excuse for its refusal.

The Tribunal ordered the corporation to produce the records, pay a $3,000 penalty, and reimburse the applicant's $200 filing fee.

The applicant condominium owner filed a request for records seeking proxies from an annual general meeting and a list of owners and mortgagees.

The respondent condominium corporation provided the redacted proxies and uploaded the list of owners during Stage 2 of the tribunal process.

The applicant sought further information and requested to proceed to Stage 3.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss and ultimately dismissed the application under Rule 19.1, finding that the requested records had been provided and the Tribunal had no legal power to hear or decide the remaining issues.

The applicant condominium owner filed a Request for Records with the Condominium Authority Tribunal.

The parties reached a settlement during Stage 2 of the tribunal process.

The tribunal issued a consent order requiring the respondent condominium corporation to provide specific paper records to the applicant and to deliver all future communications and notifications to the applicant via regular mail, unless registered mail is required by law or the corporation's governing documents.

The applicant condominium owner requested board minutes from the respondent condominium corporation.

The respondent provided minutes but failed to disclose that it had withheld 'in camera' minutes containing redacted information.

The Tribunal found this constituted a refusal to provide records without a reasonable excuse and ordered a $1,000 penalty.

The Tribunal also ordered the respondent to provide written explanations for redactions in two sets of minutes, but dismissed the applicant's claims regarding missing decisions and the respondent's request for legal costs.

The applicant condominium owner sought various records from the respondent condominium corporation.

During Stage 2 mediation, the parties reached a confidential settlement agreement regarding the payment for and delivery of the requested records.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal issued a consent order incorporating the terms of the settlement, requiring the respondent to provide the specified records within 15 days of receiving payment.

The applicant filed an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal.

After Stage 2 mediation, the applicant was given the opportunity to move the case to Stage 3 but failed to pay the required filing fee within the permitted time.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application and closed the case under Rule 32.3 of the CAT's Rules of Practice.

The applicant, a condominium owner and former board treasurer, sought an order for the production of various condominium records after the respondent corporation failed to provide them despite a signed waiver and a subsequent formal request.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its obligations under the Condominium Act, 1998 and Ontario Regulation 48/01.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to provide all requested records, including financial statements, budgets, and contracts, in unredacted electronic format at no cost to the applicant.

The applicant, a unit owner and former board member, applied to the Condominium Authority Tribunal for access to various condominium records, including in-camera board minutes, management reports, and notes from informal board meetings.

The Tribunal denied access to the in-camera minutes, finding that redactions would not protect privacy in a small building and that statutory exemptions applied.

The Tribunal also denied access to management reports, except for portions formally adopted into the minutes.

However, the Tribunal ordered the respondent to produce notes from two informal board sessions because the board had previously resolved to include them in the official minute book.

Requests for penalties and costs from both parties were dismissed.

The applicant and respondent settled their dispute during the Condominium Authority Tribunal's Stage 2 Mediation.

Having satisfied the conditions of the settlement, both parties consented to closing the file.

The Tribunal ordered the file closed, noting the matter was fully resolved and cannot be re-opened.

The applicant and respondent settled their dispute during the Condominium Authority Tribunal's Stage 2 Mediation.

Having satisfied the conditions of the settlement, both parties consented to closing the file.

The Tribunal ordered the file closed, noting the case was fully resolved and cannot be re-opened.