2 total
Condominium occupants ordered to remove dog and comply with parking rules; $6,700 in costs awarded.
The applicant condominium corporation brought an application against a unit owner and its occupants for breaching the corporation's parking and no-pet rules.
The occupants parked multiple vehicles in spaces assigned to other units and kept a dog on the property despite a strict no-pet rule, claiming the dog was a service animal.
The Tribunal found the occupants violated the parking rules and failed to provide evidence supporting the need for a service animal accommodation.
The Tribunal ordered the occupants to comply with the parking rules, permanently remove the dog, and pay $6,700 in costs.
Motion to reopen closed case dismissed as underlying governance dispute fell outside Tribunal's records access jurisdiction.
The applicant brought a motion to reopen a Condominium Authority Tribunal case that was closed after 30 days of inactivity during the negotiation stage.
The applicant originally sought access to condominium records to investigate concerns regarding property maintenance and reserve fund usage.
Applying the Frey factors, the Tribunal declined to reopen the case, finding that the underlying dispute primarily concerned condominium governance and the consequences of the information in the records, rather than a dispute over records access under section 55 of the Condominium Act.
The motion was dismissed due to compelling concerns over the Tribunal's jurisdiction to address the substantive governance issues.
