The appellant appealed a trial judgment finding him personally liable on a promissory note.
He argued the trial judge erred in finding he signed the note, in finding the funds were advanced to him personally rather than to a corporation, and in allowing the late introduction of the original note at trial.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding ample evidence to support the trial judge's factual findings and no procedural unfairness, as the appellant had not pleaded forgery or objected to the document's admission at trial.
