2 total
Appeal regarding hydro-electric energy contract interpretation dismissed as moot.
The appellant appealed a judgment regarding the interpretation of a contract for the provision of hydro-electric energy.
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal as moot in light of its concurrent judgment in Newfoundland (Attorney General) v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp.
Appeal dismissed; lower courts correctly construed Clause 2(e) of the statutory lease.
The Attorney General of Newfoundland appealed a decision regarding the interpretation of Clause 2(e) of Part I of a statutory lease executed pursuant to the Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited (Lease) Act, 1961.
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal, holding that both the Trial Division and the Court of Appeal had arrived at the correct construction of the clause, albeit by different routes.
