The appellant, G.H., appealed convictions for sexual assault and related sexual touching charges, and sought leave to appeal his sentence.
The trial judge had found the complainant credible but with reliability concerns, which were addressed by confirmatory evidence from the complainant's brother.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, finding no error in the trial judge's assessment of evidence, including the use of confirmatory evidence and the holistic approach to ongoing sexual abuse allegations.
The Court also dismissed the sentence appeal, finding the five-year sentence within range despite a factual error by the trial judge.
However, a lifetime Sex Offender Information Registration Act (SOIRA) order was varied to 20 years in light of recent Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence.