4 total
The court awarded the respondent $25,000 in costs and refused to let the appellant re-litigate bonus entitlements under the guise of seeking clarification.
This is a costs endorsement following the Court of Appeal's decision on an appeal of a wrongful dismissal case.
The appellant insurance company sought to reduce the respondent employee's damages by challenging the reasonable notice period and bonus entitlements.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, reducing the notice period but dismissing other arguments.
The respondent sought clarification on bonus entitlements and the parties exchanged submissions on costs.
The Court declined to entertain new arguments raised by the appellant at the costs stage and awarded costs to the respondent.
The Court of Appeal reduced a 30-month notice period to 24 months but upheld the employee's common law entitlement to bonus payments because the employer failed to communicate a restrictive termination provision.
A senior vice president with 37 years of service was terminated without cause following a minor dispute over promotional sporting event tickets.
The motion judge awarded 30 months' notice and full bonus entitlements during the notice period.
On appeal, the employer challenged both the notice period and the bonus entitlement.
The Court of Appeal reduced the notice period to 24 months, finding no exceptional circumstances warranting a longer period.
However, the court upheld the bonus entitlement, finding that while the termination provision in the bonus plans was unambiguous and would have limited the employee's entitlement, the provision was unenforceable because it was not properly communicated to the employee by the employer.
Successful defendants awarded partial indemnity costs after motion to strike claim.
Following a successful motion striking the plaintiff’s statement of claim, certain defendants sought costs including substantial indemnity costs.
The court considered the parties’ extensive submissions regarding delay, cross-examinations, and the complexity of the motion.
While the defendants were wholly successful and entitled to costs, the court declined to award substantial indemnity costs, finding the plaintiff’s conduct did not rise to an abuse of process.
The court awarded partial indemnity costs and rejected the plaintiff’s request to stay the costs determination pending the outcome of a human rights application in another forum.
Judicial review of arbitrator's dismissal of grievance for delay dismissed as reasonable.
The applicant union sought judicial review of an arbitrator's award dismissing its grievance for delay.
The arbitrator found that the union failed to explain a one-year delay in scheduling the resumption of the arbitration hearing, contrary to the collective agreement's requirement to expedite proceedings.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding the arbitrator's interpretation of the collective agreement and exercise of discretion to be reasonable, and noting that the union's delay in perfecting the judicial review application also militated against granting relief.
