The appellant appealed a trial judgment regarding spousal and child support, arguing the trial judge failed to award compensatory support, failed to discount the respondent's business expenses, and improperly imputed an income of $40,000 to her based on expert evidence.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge adequately addressed the compensatory aspects of support under Moge, properly assessed the respondent's income, and made no error in qualifying the expert or imputing income to the appellant given her failure to make reasonable efforts to obtain employment.