1 total
Defence of vendor defendants struck for failing to comply with order to pay security.
The plaintiffs moved to strike the defendants' joint defence and counterclaim for failing to comply with previous orders requiring the vendor defendants to pay security into court.
The court found the vendor defendants in clear breach of the orders without a valid excuse.
The motion was granted against the vendor defendants, striking their defence and dismissing their counterclaim.
The motion was denied against the third defendant, who was not subject to the breached orders, but they were required to amend their pleading.
