Alexandria Pike

The appellants appealed a Director's Order requiring remediation and monitoring of groundwater contamination at a former manufacturing site.

Following Nortel's insolvency proceedings, the parties reached a settlement agreement wherein the appellants agreed to withdraw their appeals and the Director agreed to revoke the Order.

The Tribunal found that the proposed withdrawals and revocation were consistent with the purpose of the Environmental Protection Act and in the public interest, as a new Director's Order would be issued to the current property owner, backed by financial assurance, to ensure ongoing risk management measures are implemented.

The appeals were dismissed and the Order was revoked.

The appellant appealed a Director's Order requiring the assessment and remediation of groundwater contamination at a former manufacturing site.

Following the appellant's insolvency and CCAA proceedings, the parties reached a settlement agreement wherein the appellant would contribute funds to the current site manager for ongoing remediation, and the Director would issue a new order with updated risk management requirements.

The Tribunal approved the settlement, finding that the withdrawal of the appeal and revocation of the original Director's Order were consistent with the purpose of the Environmental Protection Act and in the public interest.

Nortel and Nagata appealed a Director's Order requiring work to be done at a contaminated site.

Nortel, under CCAA protection, reached a settlement with the MOECC to pay approximately $3,000,000 to address outstanding environmental issues.

The Tribunal accepted the withdrawal of Nortel's appeal and the revocation of the Director's Order against Nortel, finding the settlement consistent with the Environmental Protection Act and in the public interest.

The appellant appealed a Renewable Energy Approval for a wind facility project.

Following mediation, the parties reached a settlement agreement that did not alter the approval.

The appellant withdrew the appeal on consent of all parties.

The Environmental Review Tribunal dismissed the proceeding without costs pursuant to Rule 199 of its Rules of Practice.

The appellants appealed a Director's Order requiring them to submit a clean-up plan for groundwater contamination.

During ongoing settlement discussions, Freightliner and the City of London requested party status, which was unopposed.

The Tribunal granted party status to both entities for their respective sites and extended the stay of the Director's Order to allow settlement discussions to continue.

The appellants appealed a Director's Order regarding groundwater contamination at a former manufacturing site.

The parties requested on consent that the proceeding be adjourned and the existing stay of the order be extended to allow time to finalize remedial actions.

The Tribunal found no concerns under section 143(3) of the Environmental Protection Act and granted the requested extension and adjournment.

The appellants appealed a Director's Order concerning groundwater contamination at a former manufacturing site.

Following negotiations, Nortel and the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change reached a framework agreement regarding remediation.

The parties consented to an order extending the stay of certain items in the Director's Order until June 30, 2015, and requiring Nortel to submit revised restorative action plans.

The Tribunal accepted the consent order, finding no bars to the stay under the Environmental Protection Act.

The appellant appealed a Director's Order concerning groundwater contamination remediation.

Following negotiations and related court proceedings, the parties agreed to amend the stay of the order and the appellant agreed to withdraw its appeal, save for two specific issues regarding future work plans and management/control.

The Tribunal granted the continuation of the stay and accepted the partial withdrawal of the appeal on consent.

The appellants appealed a Director's Order requiring remedial measures for groundwater contamination at a former manufacturing site.

Following a settlement agreement where Nortel agreed to pay $300,000 to the new property owner (Taggart) and Taggart agreed to a new Director's Order requiring remediation backed by financial assurance, the Director proposed to revoke the original order.

The Tribunal found the proposed revocation was consistent with the Environmental Protection Act and in the public interest, revoked the order, and dismissed the appeals.