Following a contempt motion between the plaintiff and defendants, the court addressed costs.
Although the defendants successfully defended the contempt motion, the court found it more likely than not that one defendant removed certain logbooks in contravention of court orders, which militated against awarding costs to the defendants.
The plaintiff also failed on the motion and therefore was not entitled to costs.
However, a non-party that participated in the proceedings was awarded substantial indemnity costs due to its limited but necessary involvement.
The court ordered the plaintiff to pay the non-party $25,000 plus HST and disbursements.