Tyler Moore

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

The Tribunal proceeded with the hearing pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

As the applicant bore the onus of proof and provided no evidence, the Tribunal found the applicant failed to demonstrate entitlement to removal from the Minor Injury Guideline or to the disputed medical benefits.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that their injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence despite receiving notice.

As the applicant bore the onus of proof, the Tribunal found they failed to demonstrate entitlement to removal from the MIG, the disputed medical benefit, an award, or interest.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including funding for dentures and assistive devices.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence despite receiving notice.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet her onus of demonstrating entitlement to the disputed benefits.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that their injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).

The Tribunal ordered a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

Proceeding under section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet their onus to demonstrate entitlement to removal from the MIG or to the disputed medical benefits.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that her injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) and seeking a non-earner benefit and various medical benefits.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant failed to file any written submissions or evidence.

Consequently, the Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet her onus to demonstrate entitlement to the claimed benefits or removal from the MIG.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident but his representative withdrew prior to the written hearing.

The applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal proceeded with the hearing in the applicant's absence pursuant to s. 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

Finding that the applicant failed to meet his evidentiary burden, the Tribunal held that the applicant remains within the Minor Injury Guideline and dismissed the application for medical benefits, an award, and interest.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

The Tribunal found that the applicant did not meet the evidentiary burden to demonstrate entitlement to removal from the Minor Injury Guideline or the disputed medical benefits.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident but was denied by the respondent insurer.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing before the Licence Appeal Tribunal.

The applicant failed to file any written submissions or evidence.

As the applicant bore the onus of proving entitlement to removal from the Minor Injury Guideline and the disputed medical benefits, the Tribunal found she failed to meet her evidentiary burden.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant's representative withdrew, and the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence despite receiving notice.

The Tribunal proceeded with the hearing in the applicant's absence.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet her onus to demonstrate entitlement to removal from the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) or the disputed medical benefits.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant's representative withdrew and the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

The Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence pursuant to s. 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

As the applicant failed to meet his evidentiary burden, the Tribunal found he remained within the Minor Injury Guideline and dismissed the claims for income replacement and medical benefits.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that his injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant failed to file any written submissions or evidence despite multiple reminders from the Tribunal.

As the applicant bore the onus of proving entitlement to the disputed benefits and removal from the Minor Injury Guideline, the Tribunal dismissed the application in its entirety.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that their injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

Consequently, the Tribunal found the applicant failed to meet their onus to demonstrate entitlement to the disputed benefits or removal from the MIG.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence, and did not respond to the Tribunal's inquiries or file a Notice of Withdrawal.

The Tribunal proceeded with the hearing under s. 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

As the applicant bore the onus of demonstrating entitlement to the disputed medical benefits and provided no evidence, the application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant, who was self-represented, failed to file written submissions or evidence by the deadline.

The Tribunal proceeded with the hearing in the applicant's absence pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

As the applicant bore the onus of proof and provided no evidence, the Tribunal found he failed to demonstrate entitlement to removal from the Minor Injury Guideline, income replacement benefits, or the disputed medical benefits.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant's representative withdrew prior to the hearing, and the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

Although the applicant indicated an intention to withdraw, she did not file the required form.

The Tribunal proceeded with the hearing and dismissed the application, finding the applicant failed to meet her burden of proof to establish entitlement to removal from the Minor Injury Guideline or the disputed benefits.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter was scheduled for a written hearing, but neither party filed written submissions or evidence.

The Tribunal proceeded with the hearing pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

As the applicant bore the onus of demonstrating entitlement and failed to provide any evidence, the application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant failed to file any written submissions or evidence, despite receiving notice and reminders from the Tribunal.

Pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the Tribunal proceeded with the hearing.

As the applicant bore the onus of proof and provided no evidence, the application for medical benefits, an award, and interest was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that his injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) and seeking $726.04 for physiotherapy services.

The Tribunal ordered a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

As the applicant bore the onus of proof, the Tribunal found he failed to demonstrate entitlement to removal from the MIG or the disputed medical benefit.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing their placement in the Minor Injury Guideline and claiming entitlement to chronic pain and psychological assessments.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

The applicant failed to file any written submissions or evidence.

As the applicant bore the onus of proof, the Tribunal found they failed to demonstrate entitlement to removal from the MIG or to the disputed benefits.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including a non-earner benefit and medical benefits for chiropractic services.

After the applicant's representative was removed, the applicant failed to file any written submissions or evidence for the scheduled written hearing.

The Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence and dismissed the application, finding that the applicant failed to meet the onus of demonstrating entitlement to the claimed benefits.