Timothy W. Sargeant

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration of successor rights.

The Board's rules require the responding party to post a notice of the application for affected employees, and the applicant to verify the posting.

The applicant failed to verify the posting despite numerous attempts by the Registrar's office to contact them.

The Board adjourned the application and directed the applicant to provide the required posting information within 30 days, failing which the application would be deemed dismissed.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of its predecessor union.

The Board noted that there was no verification that the required notice of the application had been posted for affected employees.

The Board adjourned the application and directed the applicant to provide verification of posting or the location of employees within 30 days, failing which the application would be deemed dismissed.

The applicant trade union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration of successor rights.

The Board noted that the applicant failed to verify that the required notices of the application had been posted for affected employees, despite numerous attempts by the Registrar's office to obtain this information.

The Board adjourned the application and directed the applicant to provide the necessary posting information within 30 days, failing which the application would be deemed dismissed.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration of successor rights.

The Board requires the responding party to post a notice of the application for affected employees, and the applicant must verify this posting.

The applicant failed to verify the posting despite numerous attempts by the Registrar's office to contact them.

The Board adjourned the matter, directing the applicant to provide proof of posting or the location for the Board to post the notice within 30 days, failing which the application would be deemed dismissed.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of its predecessor union.

The Board requires the responding party to post a notice of the application for affected employees, and the applicant must verify this posting.

Despite numerous attempts by the Registrar's office, no verification of posting was received.

The Board adjourned the application, directing the applicant to provide the required posting information within 30 days, failing which the application would be deemed dismissed.

The applicant trade union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration of successor rights.

The Board requires the responding party to post a notice of the application for affected employees, and the applicant must verify this posting.

The applicant failed to verify the posting despite numerous attempts by the Registrar's office.

The Board adjourned the matter, directing the applicant to provide the required posting information within 30 working days, failing which the application would be deemed dismissed.

The applicant union filed an application under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration of successor rights.

The Board requires the responding party to post a notice of the application for affected employees, and the applicant must verify this posting.

The applicant failed to verify the posting despite numerous attempts by the Registrar's office.

The Board adjourned the matter, directing the applicant to provide the requisite posting information within 30 working days, failing which the application would be deemed dismissed.

The Board issued a decision correcting a previous statement that the applicant had not been found to be a trade union.

Noting that the applicant had already proven its status as a trade union in a prior proceeding, the Board relieved the applicant from the obligation to file materials regarding its status.

The applicant appealed an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

Prior to the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the Board that it had received instructions to withdraw the appeal.

The Board granted leave to withdraw the appeal and terminated the matter.

The applicant's application was returned on April 17, 2000, and was not resubmitted.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the matter due to the applicant's failure to resubmit the application.

The applicant union filed an application against the responding college.

The Board noted that if the responding party's submission were upheld, the applicant would simply re-file.

To avoid this, the Board directed that the application be treated as brought pursuant to section 77 of the Colleges Collective Bargaining Act, and gave the responding party a deadline to file a response.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least 40% of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board ordered a representation vote.

The intervenor union requested the application be dismissed due to alleged breaches of a court order, the union constitution, and Board rules, which the Board rejected.

However, because the intervenor also argued the application was untimely under section 7(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the Board directed that the ballot box be sealed pending further determination.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had the requisite 40% membership support to order a representation vote.

The intervenor union requested the application be dismissed due to alleged breaches of a court order, the CLC Constitution, and the Board's Rules of Procedure, as well as being untimely under section 7(4) of the Act.

The Board rejected the requests to dismiss the application without a vote, but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending determination of the timeliness issue.

The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

A representation vote was held, and more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in opposition to the union.

As no statements of desire to make representations were filed, the Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the employer.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees at the responding party's Wingham location.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union.

A certificate was ordered to issue and previously set hearing dates were cancelled.

The applicant filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the employer.

The Board ordered the destruction of the ballots and cancelled previously set hearing dates.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted an extension of time for the responding party to file a response until August 31, 2000.

The applicant requested to withdraw her application against the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The application was unopposed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the application and issued the requested declaration.

The applicant union sought leave to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.