S. Lessard

The Ontario Review Board conducted a mandatory annual review of the disposition for an accused found not criminally responsible for second-degree murder.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia, had recently transitioned to a 24-hour supervised community residence and demonstrated sustained psychiatric stability on medication.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to the conditional nature of his stability and the severity of the index offence.

The Board ordered a continued detention order with privileges for supervised community living and a reduction in reporting frequency, finding it to be the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.

The Ontario Review Board conducted a mandatory annual review of the accused's disposition under s. 672.81(1) of the Criminal Code.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault and other offences, has diagnoses of schizophrenia and severe stimulant use disorder.

While the accused demonstrated stability in the community, the Board found that he continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to the risk of rapid clinical destabilization if he relapses into substance use.

The Board concluded that a conditional discharge was premature and ordered the continuation of the existing detention order to ensure adequate supervision and risk management.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was found not criminally responsible for second-degree murder.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his history of severe violence in the context of substance-induced psychosis.

While the accused has remained psychiatrically stable and compliant with treatment, the Board concluded that a detention order remains the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.

The Board granted additional privileges, including discretionary community living and travel within Southern Ontario, subject to hospital approval and ongoing supervision.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory hearing to review the disposition of the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for sexual assault.

The accused's diagnoses include schizophrenia and unspecified paraphilic disorder.

The Board accepted clinical evidence that while the accused's psychiatric condition is stable, he continues to experience residual symptoms and cognitive impairments that require a highly structured hospital environment.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety and ordered the continuation of his detention at the hospital as the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition under s. 672.81(1) of the Criminal Code.

The accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for mischief and other offences, suffers from schizophrenia and substance use disorders.

While the accused demonstrated clinical stability in a highly structured community setting, the Board found that he continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his reliance on supervision for medication compliance and abstinence.

The Board concluded that continuing the existing detention order remains the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for assault causing bodily harm, was subject to an annual review hearing by the Ontario Review Board.

The Hospital and the Attorney General recommended continued detention, while the accused sought a conditional discharge.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his schizophrenia, limited insight, and upcoming transitions in housing and employment.

The Board ordered a continued detention order with reduced reporting requirements and added travel passes to Quebec.

The accused was previously found not criminally responsible for uttering death threats and was subject to a detention order at a psychiatric hospital.

At the annual review hearing, the Review Board considered whether the accused continued to pose a significant threat to public safety.

Relying on uncontroverted expert psychiatric evidence, the Board found that the accused's history of rapid relapse, polysubstance use, and psychotic symptomatology necessitated ongoing supervision.

The Board concluded that the accused remained a significant threat and ordered the continuation of the existing detention order.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the disposition for an accused found not criminally responsible for assault and other offences.

The accused sought an absolute discharge, while the hospital and Attorney General sought a continuation of the detention order.

Relying on uncontroverted expert psychiatric evidence, the Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to a severe alcohol use disorder and organic brain injury, which predictably lead to aggression and violence when intoxicated.

The Board concluded that the necessary and appropriate disposition was to continue the detention order, as the accused requires a highly supervised environment to maintain abstinence and medication adherence.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for criminal harassment, was subject to an annual Review Board hearing.

The hospital and the Attorney General jointly submitted that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety and required a continued Detention Order, albeit with a minor modification to allow for more independent housing.

The Board accepted the joint submission, finding that the accused's bipolar disorder, lack of insight, and potential for rapid decompensation necessitated ongoing supervision and a Detention Order under s. 672.54 of the Criminal Code.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for robbery and other offences, appeared before the Ontario Review Board for an annual disposition hearing.

The hospital and the Crown sought a continuation of his detention order with slight modifications, while the accused sought an absolute discharge, arguing he no longer posed a significant threat to public safety.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat due to his lack of insight, history of medication non-compliance, and risk of decompensation if discharged.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order with the removal of the abstention clause and a reduction in reporting frequency.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for two counts of robbery.

The Board considered expert evidence indicating that while the accused had shown improved stability and medication adherence, he continued to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his primary psychotic disorder and history of substance use.

The Board ordered the continuation of the existing Detention Order with amendments agreed upon by the parties.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review and a Restriction of Liberty hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for assault.

The hospital had transferred the accused to a higher security unit following unprovoked assaults on staff and co-patients.

The Board found that the restriction of liberty was warranted and necessary due to the accused's unpredictable violence driven by impulsivity and autism-related deficits.

The Board concluded the accused remains a significant threat to public safety and ordered the continuation of the Detention Order.

The Board declined to remove the requirement for supervised accommodation but removed the condition requiring abstinence from alcohol and drugs, finding it clinically unnecessary.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for assault with a weapon and other offences.

The accused, diagnosed with bipolar disorder and substance use disorders, had made progress but continued to struggle with cannabis use, alcohol, gambling, and aggressive behaviour.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to the safety of the public.

The Board ordered that the current detention order at the secure forensic unit be maintained, with privileges up to and including community living in approved accommodation.

The accused was found not criminally responsible for arson due to a mental disorder.

At the initial disposition hearing before the Ontario Review Board, the parties jointly recommended a conditional discharge.

The Board accepted the expert risk assessment indicating the accused's risk of violence is low when abstinent and supported, but that he remains vulnerable to relapse.

Finding that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety, the Board ordered a conditional discharge with terms requiring abstinence from intoxicants, testing, and ongoing psychiatric treatment.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for arson.

The accused had made significant progress in hospital, adhering to medication and remaining abstinent from substances, following a new diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

However, the Board accepted expert evidence that the accused remained stress-vulnerable, lacked insight, and posed a significant threat to public safety if decompensated.

The Board ordered a Detention Disposition with expanded pass privileges to support his reintegration goals.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's Conditional Discharge.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for assault and failing to comply with a recognizance, has schizophrenia and a history of violence.

The Board accepted the joint recommendation of the parties and the uncontroverted expert evidence that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety without professional support in place.

The Board ordered the continuation of the Conditional Discharge, with the removal of the requirement to submit urine and breath samples, pending the accused's transition to a non-forensic psychiatric team.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for various offences in 2015, suffers from schizophrenia and major neurocognitive disorder.

He currently resides in a secure long-term care facility.

Relying on expert psychiatric evidence that the accused's risk is mitigated by his structured environment and medication, the Board found that he no longer poses a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered an absolute discharge.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition following a finding of not criminally responsible for assault with a weapon.

The accused, diagnosed with ultra-treatment resistant schizophrenia, had been residing in the community under a Conditional Discharge.

The Board accepted expert evidence that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety due to his lack of insight and the high risk of decompensation and violence if he were to discontinue his medication.

The Board ordered the continuation of the Conditional Discharge with a treatment condition, but declined to impose a weapons prohibition.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition.

The accused was previously found not criminally responsible for assault causing bodily harm and was subject to a detention order at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.

The Board found that the accused, who suffers from schizoaffective disorder and has a history of substance use and violence, continues to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order, but expanded the accused's community living privileges to include the Greater Toronto Area to facilitate his transition to supportive housing.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the disposition for an accused found not criminally responsible for uttering death threats.

The accused suffers from treatment-resistant schizophrenia and experiences pervasive bizarre and grandiose delusions.

While the accused has not engaged in physical violence since 2008, he has a history of threatening behaviour and lacks insight into his illness.

The Board found that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety.

However, noting his successful transition to permanent supportive housing and compliance with long-acting injectable medication, the Board ordered a Conditional Discharge subject to conditions including a residency requirement and abstinence from non-medical intoxicants other than cannabis.