Marilyn Silverman

The applicant appealed a decision made by an Occupational Health and Safety Inspector under section 61(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

The appeal was filed outside the 30-day time limit prescribed by the Act.

The applicant requested an extension of time, citing ongoing discussions with the Ministry of Labour.

The Board held that it has no discretion to extend the time for filing an appeal under section 61(1) and dismissed the application as untimely.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Based on the agreement of the parties regarding the appropriate bargaining unit and the membership evidence filed, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

A representation vote was held, and more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The applicant filed an application against the responding party.

Having regard to a settlement filed by the parties, the Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of North Shore Ambulance Limited working in Schreiber, Ontario.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant employer appealed an order to pay issued by an Employment Standards Officer.

The parties signed Minutes of Settlement, but the employer subsequently requested to withdraw the application because it no longer wished to comply with the settlement.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board refused to grant leave to withdraw and scheduled a hearing.

The Ontario Public Service Employees Union applied for certification to represent employees of Ambulance Consulting Services Inc. in London.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and determined the appropriate bargaining unit based on the parties' agreement.

Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed unit were union members, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees of the responding party municipality.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The previously scheduled meeting and hearing dates were cancelled.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the proposed bargaining unit appropriate.

The Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant union.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of G.G.S. Plastic Engineering Inc. A representation vote was held, and more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union.

No statements of desire to make representations were filed.

The Board issued a certificate to the union for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

A related unfair labour practice complaint was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement and requested the Board to incorporate specific provisions into a consent order.

The Board declared that the responding party was bound to the provincial collective agreement and had breached it by failing to make timely remittances.

The Board ordered the responding party to pay $16,394.00 to the applicant and noted the agreement for bi-weekly remittances until the delinquency was resolved.

The application was adjourned sine die.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding hospital.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The employees of the bargaining unit applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding union.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50 per cent of the ballots cast were in opposition to the union.

As no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and ordered the destruction of the ballots after 30 days.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on future certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant applied to decertify the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer in the specified bargaining unit.