J. G. Knight

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardFeb 2, 2000

Caroline Rowan

OLRB0 cases1999–2022

Grievance referral adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

On consent of the parties, the Board adjourned the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.

International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Locals 721 and 736 v. The Electrical Power Systems Construction Association, 2000 CanLII 10634

Rick Lediard

2 cases2000–2000

Michael Horan

38 cases1980–2001

David Watson

22 cases1982–2010

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardFeb 2, 2000

Board adds responding parties and directs production of documents to be addressed at next hearing.

The applicant union requested to add Richard H. Gay Holdings Ltd. and Jarigay Investments Limited as responding parties and to amend its production request to include documents relating to these entities.

The Board granted the request to add the responding parties and directed the Registrar to reprocess the Notices to Employees.

Regarding the production of documents pursuant to s. 1(5) of the Labour Relations Act, the Board directed the responding parties to bring all arguably relevant documents in their possession or control to the next scheduled hearing date, where the parties could make submissions on any outstanding production issues.

International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen v. Gay Construction Limited, 2000 CanLII 12509

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardFeb 2, 2000

Board directs second representation vote in union certification application following parties' agreement.

The applicant union filed an application for certification and an unfair labour practice complaint under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, seeking a second representation vote under section 11.

The parties met with a Labour Relations Officer and reached an agreement on all issues in dispute, including the conditions for a second vote.

Pursuant to the agreement and section 11 of the Act, the Board directed a second representation vote for the agreed-upon bargaining unit and eligible voters.

The Board also ordered the posting of a Notice to Employees outlining their rights under the Act.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 353 v. Elco-Tech Inc., 2000 CanLII 13581

M. A. Nairn

OLRB0 cases1989–2001

J. G. Knight

A. Haward

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 28, 2000

Board directs representation vote in construction industry certification application.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union at the time the application was made.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the voting constituency.

The applicant will be required to establish its trade union status prior to any certificate issuing.

Universal Workers Union, L.I.U.N.A. Local 183 v. Azurix North American o/a Uniflow Co. and Philip Utilities, 2000 CanLII 7911

M. A. Nairn

OLRB0 cases1989–2001

J. G. Knight

A. Haward

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 28, 2000

Jurisdictional dispute application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union requested to withdraw its jurisdictional dispute application against the responding employer and a competing union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and withdrew the application with leave.

The Board also confirmed that the applicant union would not intervene in a related grievance filed by the competing union.

Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 1036 v. Newman Construction Inc., 2000 CanLII 12533

J. G. Knight

Harry Freedman

OLRB0 cases1984–2001

A. Haward

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 28, 2000

Application withdrawn at the request of the applicant.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application against the responding parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

Ontario Sheet Metal Workers’ and Roofers’ Conference Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association v. Atlantic Roofers Ontario Ltd., 2000 CanLII 9633

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 27, 2000

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 736 v. James Kemp Construction Limited, 2000 CanLII 9461

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 27, 2000

Consent order issued for $54,163.07 in delinquent union dues and benefit remittances.

The applicant union referred a grievance to arbitration under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, concerning the employer's failure to pay union dues, welfare benefits, and pension remittances.

Prior to the scheduled hearing, the parties reached a settlement wherein the employer admitted to the delinquency and agreed to damages totalling $54,163.07.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued consent orders and declarations in accordance with the parties' minutes of settlement.

International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 736 v. Columbus Plate Limited, 2000 CanLII 12830

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

A. Haward

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 27, 2000

Board directs representation vote in construction industry certification application, finding section 8.1 inapplicable.

The applicant union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding party employer asserted there were no employees at work in the proposed bargaining unit on the application date and gave notice under section 8.1.

The Board held that section 8.1 does not apply to construction applications.

Finding that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support based on the information provided, the Board directed a representation vote for the proposed non-ICI bargaining unit of construction labourers.

Universal Workers Union, L.I.U.N.A. Local 183 v. Diamante Urban Corporation, 2000 CanLII 13187

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 26, 2000

Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.

The applicant union and responding employers agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 786 v. Normac Equipment/Construction Limited and Gorf Contracting Limited, 2000 CanLII 8831

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 25, 2000

Employer ordered to pay over $36,000 in damages for collective agreement violation in default judgment.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer violated the collective agreement by employing non-union workers.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found the employer violated the collective agreement and ordered it to pay $36,334.96 in damages and $214.00 in filing fees.

The International Union of Painters and Allied Trades (formerly known as The International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades), District Council 46 (Local Union 1891) v. City Acoustics Limited, 2000 CanLII 5094

J. G. Knight

Gail Misra

OLRB0 cases1994–2025

A. Haward

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 25, 2000

Board issues consent order directing employer to pay $5,000 in damages for collective agreement violations.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement.

The Board issued a consent order declaring the responding party bound by the collective agreement and ordering it to pay $5,000 in damages for violating the agreement.

The International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 46 (Local Union 1891) v. Keyon Drywall Inc., 2000 CanLII 3087

Winston Anderson

Tony Cornacchia

2 cases1995–2000

Silvio Ferri

Pat Casserly

Nunzio Dilecce

2 cases2000–2001

N. L. Jesin

70 cases1987–2001

Lister Tenant

3 cases2000–2001

John Moszynski

71 cases1986–2017

John Barrack

8 cases1994–2001

Marilyn Silverman

OLRB0 cases2000–2001

J. G. Knight

A. Haward

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 25, 2000

Motion for intervenor status in a certification application denied due to late filing and insufficient legal interest.

The applicant union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

At the commencement of the hearing, another union brought a motion requesting intervenor status.

The Board denied the motion, finding that the intervention was filed late without reasonable expediency and did not disclose a sufficient legal interest to warrant intervenor status.

Carpenters & Allied Workers Local 27, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Metro Concrete Floors (1990) Inc., 2000 CanLII 7792

M. A. Nairn

OLRB0 cases1989–2001

J. G. Knight

G. McMenemy

Second request for reconsideration of certification decision dismissed as untimely and unsupported by evidence.

The applicant union sought a second reconsideration of a certification decision, alleging that the Board Officer had noted the trade of each voter on the ballots during the certification vote.

The Board dismissed the request, noting that the applicant failed to raise this issue in its initial reconsideration request, offending the principle of finality.

Furthermore, a review of the preserved ballots revealed no such markings, contradicting the applicant's assertions.

Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 527 v. David S. Laflamme Construction, 2000 CanLII 12820

Dan Greco

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Board issues consent order declaring employer bound by collective agreement and ordering $1,000 in damages.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the scheduled hearing, the parties reached a settlement and requested a consent order.

The Board issued the requested declarations and orders, including a declaration that the responding party is bound by the collective agreement and an order to pay $1,000 in damages for violating it.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 93 v. J.C. Sulpher Construction Ltd., 2000 CanLII 12287

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board following minutes of settlement.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application following the execution of Minutes of Settlement.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 2486 v. Laamanen Construction Limited, 2000 CanLII 4512

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Consent order issued declaring employer bound by collective agreement and ordering $37,500 in damages for violations.

The applicant union filed a grievance referral under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the scheduled hearing, the parties reached a settlement and requested a consent order from the Board.

The Board issued the consent order, declaring the responding party bound by the collective agreement, finding violations of several articles, and ordering the responding party to pay $37,500 in damages to the applicant.

International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsworkers, Local 7 v. Sam Pugliese operating as Marquese Tile and Marble, 2000 CanLII 11997

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Board issued a consent order for $8,022.88 in damages following a grievance settlement.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging that the responding party employer violated their collective agreement.

Prior to the scheduled hearing, the parties reached a settlement.

The Board issued a consent order incorporating the terms of the settlement, which included a declaration that the employer was bound by the collective agreement, a declaration that it had violated the agreement, and an order to pay $8,022.88 in damages to the union.

Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 837 v. King Forming, 2000 CanLII 12046

J. G. Knight

Gail Misra

OLRB0 cases1994–2025

A. Haward