Inge M. Stamp

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 18, 2000

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

Drywall Acoustic Lathing and Insulation Local 675, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Joseph A. Montesano and Carmine Fantauzzi operating as Eastpartk Interiors, 2000 CanLII 10965

Inge M. Stamp

G. Pickell

A. Haward

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 18, 2000

Application adjourned sine die for up to one year at the applicant's request.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the application.

No one appeared for the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no further request is made.

Drywall Acoustic Lathing and Insulation Local 675, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Lopes Drywall & Acoustics Inc., 2000 CanLII 8894

Jack Slaughter

7 cases1988–2001

Inge M. Stamp

G. Pickell

A. Haward

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 17, 2000

Board issued a consent order for $40,000 interim settlement for collective agreement violations.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

On the scheduled hearing date, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement to settle the matter.

The responding party acknowledged it was bound by the collective agreement and had violated its terms.

The Board issued a consent order incorporating the settlement terms, including a declaration of the violations and an order for the responding party to pay $40,000 as an interim partial settlement.

The matter was rescheduled to determine any additional moneys owing.

Carpenters and Allied Workers, Local 27 United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. 1328156 Ontario Limited and Resici Group Inc., 2000 CanLII 12124

Karima Chatur

53 cases1999–2001

Inge M. Stamp

Employer's request for review of Order to Pay dismissed for failure to appear.

The applicant employer requested a review of an Order to Pay but failed to appear at the scheduled hearing.

After waiting the customary half hour, the Board granted the responding parties' request to dismiss the matter.

The application was terminated and the Director of Employment Standards was directed to pay the employee the monies per the Order to Pay.

Playtime Imports (1086976 Ontario Limited) v. LeDrew, 2000 CanLII 12560

Inge M. Stamp

G. Pickell

A. Haward

Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.

Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association, Local 30 v. Ritz Sheet Metal Inc., 2000 CanLII 10904

Karima Chatur

53 cases1999–2001

Inge M. Stamp

Employer's request for review of Order to Pay dismissed for failure to attend hearing.

The applicant employer requested a review of an Order to Pay.

On the scheduled hearing date, neither the applicant nor the responding employee appeared.

After waiting the customary half hour, the Board granted the Ministry of Labour's request to dismiss the application.

The Director of Employment Standards was directed to pay the monies to the employee as per the Order to Pay.

1106435 Ontario Limited v. McIntyre, 2000 CanLII 12390

Inge M. Stamp

G. Pickell

A. Haward

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 1059 v. Eton Construction (Canada) Inc., 2000 CanLII 8339

Vic Prato

In Private Practice21 cases1998–2025

S. C. Bernardo

42 cases1980–2001

Robert Gibson

J. Bilowus

Harold Caley

15 cases1983–2001

Basil Humphrys

Inge M. Stamp

G. Pickell

A. Haward

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 2, 2000

Request for reconsideration of decision denying intervenor status in a certification application dismissed.

The intervenor trade union requested reconsideration of the Board's decision denying it intervenor status in a certification application.

The intervenor argued it was denied natural justice and that the Board's ruling was contrary to previous jurisprudence regarding notice.

The Board dismissed the request, finding that the intervenor raised no new arguments that could not have been made at the original hearing, and that the right to file a grievance under its collective agreement would not be affected by the Board's determination of the employee list in the certification application.

Teamsters Local Union 91 v. Bot Construction (Canada) Ltd., 2000 CanLII 13452

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 2, 2000

Hearing adjourned and time extended to allow contractors who did not receive notice to file responses.

The Board adjourned a scheduled hearing and extended the time for contractors to file responses after discovering that several contractors, whom the responding union asserted should be listed on Schedule 'E', may not have received notice of the application.

The applicant was directed to send a copy of the decision to the affected contractors.

Metropolitan Toronto Road Builders Association v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 793, 2000 CanLII 13183

Robert Gibson

In Private Practice21 cases1998–2025

N. L. Jesin

70 cases1987–2001

Michael Horan

38 cases1980–2001

Mark Lewis

17 cases1991–2014

Blair McCreadie

17 cases2000–2015

A. Minsky

7 cases1981–2001

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 26, 2000

Corporate responding parties directed to proceed first in consolidated related employer and unfair labour practice applications.

At a pre-hearing conference involving multiple related employer, sale of business, and unfair labour practice applications, the Ontario Labour Relations Board determined the order of proceeding.

The applicant unions alleged that the corporate responding parties conspired to form a new entity to circumvent bargaining rights.

The Board directed that the corporate responding parties proceed first to call their evidence, followed by the Carpenters union, and then the applicant unions.

International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 721 v. Four Hundred Structures Inc., 2000 CanLII 12728

Inge M. Stamp

G. Pickell

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 18, 2000

Application adjourned sine die on consent for a period not exceeding one year.

The applicant union and responding employers agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if no party requested to proceed.

Carpenters and Allied Workers Local 27 v. 833359 Ontario Limited, 2000 CanLII 8477

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 14, 2000

Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.

The applicants and responding parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

Ronald Fallon and George Struz v. Eaton Yale Ltd. o/a Commander Electrical Equipment and Global Driver Services Inc. and Ministry of Labour, 2000 CanLII 9473

Walter Winiarski

Rick Currie

7 cases1995–2001

M. Patrick Moran

36 cases1982–2011

Marcel Secours

L. A. Richmond

78 cases1983–2001

Jim Scattergood

George McGeachie

Douglas J. Wray

69 cases1980–2001

Donald K. Eady

20 cases1990–2005

Clayton Bell

In Private Practice21 cases1993–2015

Carolyn Hart

Andrea Bowker

Practising Law - Employed70 cases1995–2026

Inge M. Stamp

G. Pickell

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 11, 2000

Board confirmed employer's assignment of concrete block removal work to Boilermakers over Labourers' jurisdictional claim.

The applicant union filed a jurisdictional dispute under section 99 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, challenging the responding employer's assignment of removing and replacing loose concrete blocks over boilers at a nuclear power plant to the responding union (Boilermakers).

The applicant claimed the work should have been assigned to its members, while an intervenor union argued for a composite crew.

After reviewing the employer's past practice evidence, the Board declined to change the assignment and confirmed the work was properly assigned to the Boilermakers.

Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 1059 v. Ontario Power Generation Inc., 2000 CanLII 13163

Michael Horan

38 cases1980–2001

Joseph Liberman

Suspended Administratively53 cases1980–2001

John Moszynski

71 cases1986–2017

David McKee

85 cases1980–2000

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 7, 2000

Related employer and sale of business applications dismissed; no scheme to defeat bargaining rights found.

The applicant union sought declarations under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging a sale of business and that the responding parties operated associated or related businesses under common control.

The Board dismissed the section 69 application as it was not pursued.

Regarding section 1(4), the Board found that Roycet was solely a sales and marketing company not engaged in the construction industry, and dismissed the application against it.

For A.R.G. and Tiberini Limited, while acknowledging they were related employers, the Board declined to exercise its discretion to make a single employer declaration.

The Board found no scheme to defeat bargaining rights or transfer of work, noting the applicant acquired its bargaining rights with full knowledge of the existing arrangements and the potential for a jurisdictional dispute over the installation of the new wall systems.

Carpenters & Allied Workers Local 27 v. Tiberini Construction and Holding Limited, 2000 CanLII 13288

Rocco Giardullo

Richard Lyall

3 cases1993–2000

Paul Young

19 cases1986–2013

Mark J. Lewis

20 cases1994–2001

Marcia Kredentser

6 cases2000–2001

Joshua Brull

Jorge Vala

2 cases1999–2000

Harold Biso

D. Wray

22 cases1980–2023

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 5, 2000

Application for declarations and directions under section 144 of the Labour Relations Act dismissed.

The applicants filed an application for a declaration or direction under section 144 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

After a hearing, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application, finding it was not persuaded to make the requested declarations and directions.

Reasons were to follow.

Fieldgate Vellore Limited v. Central Ontario Regional Council of Carpenters, Drywall & Allied Workers, 2000 CanLII 13465

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 28, 2000

Board grants applicant's name change and approves notice arrangements for accreditation application.

The applicant sought to amend its name to Toronto and Area Road Builders Association following its incorporation and approval by its members.

The Board granted the name change.

The Board also approved the parties' arrangements for providing notice to road building contractors listed on Schedule F via newspaper advertisements and individual notices.

Finally, the Board directed the applicant to add eight contractors proposed by the responding party to Schedule E, subject to a final determination of their status, and abridged the time for filing employer responses.

Metropolitan Toronto Road Builders Association v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 793, 2000 CanLII 12020

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 27, 2000

Application for reconsideration of a decision dismissing a certification application after a representation vote is dismissed.

The applicant union requested reconsideration of the Board's April 28, 1998 decision, which dismissed the application following a representation vote.

The intervenor opposed the request.

The Board found no persuasive reason to reconsider its prior decision and dismissed the application for reconsideration.

Labourers’ International Union of North America v. Exclusive Carpentry Enterprises Limited, 2000 CanLII 12612

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 26, 2000

Duty of fair representation complaint dismissed; section 74 does not regulate internal union affairs.

The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging dissatisfaction with the union's conduct during collective bargaining negotiations.

The Board dismissed the application without a hearing under Rule 46, finding that the complaint related to internal union affairs and the union's bargaining strategy rather than its representation of the applicant vis-a-vis the employer.

The Board held that section 74 does not give it jurisdiction to oversee the collective bargaining process or internal union matters.

Jo-Dee Phoenix v. Service Employees International Union, Local 220, 2000 CanLII 12707

Inge M. Stamp