Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application against the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Union displacement application dismissed because the applicant's designation order does not cover steeplejacks.
The applicant union applied to displace a bargaining unit of steeplejacks represented by the intervenor union in the ICI sector.
The intervenor argued that the applicant lacked status to bring the application because its designation order did not cover steeplejacks, relying on a previous Board decision.
The Board agreed, adopting the reasoning from the earlier decision that the applicant's general designation for restoration work did not overlap with the specific designation for steeplejacks.
The application for certification was dismissed.
Board extends time for applicant to advise on reply evidence pending receipt of respondent's documents.
The responding party advised it intended to introduce additional documents and potentially call a witness at the next hearing date.
The applicant requested copies of the documents and an extension of time to advise whether it would call reply evidence.
The Board directed the responding party to provide the documents by November 16, 2001, and extended the applicant's time to advise on reply evidence to five days after receiving the documents.
Employer's request to reconsider bargaining unit description and representation vote is dismissed.
The responding party employer sought reconsideration of a Board decision that directed a representation vote and determined the appropriate bargaining unit.
The employer argued the bargaining unit should include Board Area 18 in addition to Areas 8 and 9, as its employees regularly moved between these areas.
The Board dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding that the union was entitled to seek certification for a unit comprising only Board Areas 8 and 9, and that the composition of the bargaining unit is determined on the application date.
The Board also held that section 158(2) of the Act does not limit a union to only one geographic area when seeking certification outside the industrial, commercial and institutional sector.
Grievance referrals consolidated and hearing adjourned to ensure proper notice to a responding party.
The applicant union referred four grievances to arbitration under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alongside a section 1(4) application.
The Board previously found the responding parties to be under common control and direction.
The Board amended the style of cause to consolidate the responding parties into one file and terminated the other three files.
As notice of the hearing was returned undelivered for one responding party, the Board adjourned the hearing to ensure proper notice.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.
Board issues consent orders and declarations incorporating parties' settlement of construction industry grievances.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding party employer violated the provincial collective agreement by engaging non-union personnel for carpentry work.
The parties reached Minutes of Settlement.
The Board issued declarations and orders incorporating the settlement, including a declaration that the employer is bound by the collective agreement and an order to pay $43,770 in damages and costs.
Consent order issued declaring employer bound by collective agreement and ordering payment of damages.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The parties reached a settlement and requested the Board to issue a consent order.
The Board declared that the responding party was bound by the collective agreement and had violated it.
The Board ordered the responding party to pay $3,497.42 in damages to the affected individuals.
Union certification granted to electrical employees association following successful representation vote.
The applicant, an employee association representing electricians and apprentices, applied for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the applicant established its status as a trade union within the meaning of the Act.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
The applicant union and responding employers agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.
Grievance referral adjourned on consent with order for responding party to produce employment and contracting documents.
The applicant referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
By consent, the Board adjourned the application to a later date and ordered the responding party to attend the hearing subject to a subpoena and to produce specified employment, payroll, and contracting documents.
Applicant permitted to file response to Request for Reconsideration by specified deadline.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a brief procedural direction permitting the applicant union to file a response to the responding party's Request for Reconsideration by November 9, 2001.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.
Board recorded agreement on voter eligibility and adjourned unfair labour practice hearing with posting directions.
The Board heard a displacement application for certification and an unfair labour practice complaint in the construction industry.
The parties reached an agreement that three specific individuals were not entitled to vote as they were not at work on the application date.
Due to scheduling conflicts, the hearing for the remaining unfair labour practice complaint was adjourned to March 2002.
The Board directed the employer to post a notice reminding employees of their rights under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, pending the continuation of the hearing.
Grievance application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant union filed a grievance against the responding party employer.
On consent of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board adjourned the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.