Motion to add responding parties granted to avoid parallel proceedings and waste of resources.
The applicant sought to amend its application to add Kawartha Quality Care, ParaMed Health Services, and Bayshore Healthcare as responding parties.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, noting that while it was late in the process, refusing the amendment would likely lead to parallel proceedings and a waste of resources since no hearing on the merits had commenced.
The Board set timelines for the new responding parties to file responses and make submissions on an existing 'no prima facie case' motion.
Request for reconsideration of decision denying pre-hearing production order in construction grievance arbitration dismissed.
The applicant requested reconsideration of the Board's decision declining to issue a pre-hearing production order in a construction industry grievance arbitration.
The Board found that the applicant's reliance on jurisprudence regarding sections 69 and 1(4) applications was misplaced, as those provisions place the onus on responding parties.
The Board concluded that the reconsideration application added nothing new to the legal arguments already considered and denied the request.
Time for filing employment standards appeal extended where application was mailed before deadline and arrived one day late.
The applicant filed a request for review of an Employment Standards Officer's decision one day after the 45-day statutory deadline.
The Board exercised its discretion under section 68(4) of the Employment Standards Act to extend the time for filing, noting that the applicant had mailed the appeal prior to the deadline.
Board directed parties to file submissions on whether to extend time for a 5.5-year-late appeal.
The applicant employer filed a request for review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act approximately five and a half years after the order was issued.
The employer claimed he could not afford to pay the requisite monies into trust at the time, and only paid the outstanding amount after his wages were garnished.
Before deciding whether to grant an extension of time for the exceptionally late application, the Board directed the Ministry of Labour and the employee to file submissions.
Hearing cancelled and application joined with another Board file.
The applicant requested the cancellation of a scheduled hearing.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board cancelled the hearing and ordered that the application be dealt with in conjunction with another Board file.
Board orders pre-hearing production of documents in related employer and sale of business application.
The applicant union requested an order for the production of documents prior to the commencement of a hearing into an application under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the responding parties to produce the requested documents in their possession, care, or control.
The Board declined to order the responding parties to provide particulars, but directed that any documents relating to those matters be produced.
Request for clarification of reprisal application denied; extension of time to file response granted.
The applicant filed a reprisal complaint under section 50 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
The responding party requested an order requiring the applicant to clarify and abbreviate the application, and sought an extension of time to file its response.
The Board found the application sufficiently clear to outline the reprisal allegations and declined to order clarification.
The Board granted the responding party an extension of time to file its response.
Applications adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the applications sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the applications will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.
Grievance referral terminated following parties' execution of Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
Following a previous decision, the parties settled all matters in dispute and filed Minutes of Settlement.
The Board terminated the proceeding.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board following a settlement between the parties.
The applicant sought to withdraw her application against McLarens Toplis Canada and the Ministry of Labour following a settlement reached between the parties.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Employment Standards Act appeal resolved by Minutes of Settlement with funds disbursed accordingly.
The applicant employer appealed an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed according to the settlement, with $650 returned to the employer, $575 paid to the employee, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Extension of time to file response granted on consent.
The responding party requested an extension of time to file its response.
With the consent of the applicants, the Board granted the request and extended the filing deadline to August 25, 2000.
Employer ordered to pay unpaid wages and costs in default grievance referral proceeding.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to pay an employee for 53 hours of work.
The responding party failed to file a response or notice of intent to defend.
Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.
The Board found the employer bound by the provincial collective agreement and ordered it to pay the unpaid wages, costs, and filing fees.
Board directs Ministry submissions on employer's request to extend time for late Employment Standards Act appeal.
The employer filed an appeal of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act more than 45 days after its issuance.
The employer requested an extension of time, citing a convoluted explanation that implicated the Employment Standards Officer.
The Board directed the Ministry of Labour to provide submissions on the extension request and required proof of payment into trust before proceeding.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 494, sought to withdraw its application against Mady Development Corporation.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Application for review of Order to Pay resolved by Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the Director in trust to disburse $9,000 to the employee and retain a $1,000 administration fee, in accordance with the settlement.
The matter was deemed terminated subject to any request by the Ministry of Labour to relist.
Employer found in violation of collective agreement for hiring non-union workers in default proceeding.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding party employer violated the collective agreement by employing non-union members to perform bargaining unit work.
The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.
The Board declared the responding party bound by the collective agreement, found it in violation, and ordered it to pay damages and produce payroll records for assessment of quantum.
The applicant union requested to withdraw its application against the responding employer and the Ministry of Labour.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave for the withdrawal, and the application was withdrawn.
Board orders production of specific invoices and subcontracting records in pre-hearing motion.
The applicant union sought an order compelling the responding parties to produce additional documents prior to the hearing, complaining of non-compliance with a previous production order.
The Board declined to issue an order compelling compliance with the previous order, noting the applicant could pursue contempt proceedings.
However, the Board ordered the production of specific additional documents, including invoices, cancelled cheques, credit applications, and subcontracting records between Marathon Delco Inc. and the other responding parties.
Adjournment granted to applicant who would be out of the country, despite initial agreement on date.
The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled hearing date because she would be out of the country.
The responding employers opposed the request, noting the claim had been outstanding for two years and the date was set on agreement.
The Board granted the adjournment, noting the employers were not prejudiced as no monies were held in trust, but directed that the new date be chosen in consultation with the responding parties.