Who is Denis Perrault?

Denis Perrault is a membre at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 24 decisions on record from 2005 to 2014. Key areas include other tribunals, administrative law, real estate law.

What tribunal does Denis Perrault sit on?

Denis Perrault sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Denis Perrault decide?

Denis Perrault's most common areas include Other Tribunals (23 decisions), Administrative Law (22 decisions), Real Estate Law (3 decisions). Denis Perrault has handled 24 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has Denis Perrault made?

Denis Perrault has 24 decisions on record from 2005 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Denis Perrault?

Representatives who frequently appear before Denis Perrault include Peter Wechselmann, Robbie Kiwan, Fred Thomson.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Denis Perrault — membre

Denis Perrault

membre·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 2005

cases · 10 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Member· 23membre· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 15, 2005

Appeal dismissed as the parties reached a settlement agreement prior to the hearing.

The appellant appealed a decision by Agricorp concerning the adjustment of his claim for his 2004 cucumber crop under the Crop Insurance Act.

Prior to the commencement of the hearing, the parties reached a settlement and signed a release.

As there were no outstanding issues to resolve, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal.

Todd Suter v. Agricorp, 2005 ONAFRAAT 29

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 20, 2005

Crop insurance contract reinstated and corn claim allowed, but denial of soybean claim upheld.

The appellants appealed AGRICORP's decisions to deny insurance coverage for certain soybean fields, cancel their 2003 crop insurance contract, and deny claims for losses on their 2003 soybean and corn crops.

The Tribunal found that AGRICORP was justified in refusing to insure specific fields due to poor farming practices and in denying the soybean claim because the appellants failed to keep accurate records and mixed insured and uninsured crops.

However, the Tribunal found that the appellants' conduct did not amount to fraud, reinstated the insurance contract, and ordered AGRICORP to pay the undisputed corn claim with interest.

Claims for punitive damages and costs were dismissed.

Goyer and Green Acres Tech v. Agricorp, 2005 ONAFRAAT 14

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 27, 2005

Crop insurance appeal granted in part; yield loss primarily attributed to poor farming practices.

The appellant appealed a decision by Agricorp concerning the adjustment of his crop insurance claim for his 2004 soybean crop.

The appellant argued that his yield loss was due to ineffective herbicides and excessive rain, while Agricorp contended the loss resulted from poor farming practices, including inadequate weed control and fertilizer use.

The Tribunal found that the yield loss was primarily caused by poor farming practices, though insured perils contributed slightly.

Acknowledging an underwriting error by Agricorp and a previous settlement offer, the Tribunal ordered Agricorp to pay the appellant $14,636.50.

Grima v. Agricorp, 2005 ONAFRAAT 10

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 13, 2005

Municipality ordered to adopt engineer's report for proposed municipal drain to serve new subdivision.

Place Riviera Place Inc. appealed the Township of Champlain's decision not to adopt an engineer's report for the proposed Gauthier Municipal Drain.

The appellant sought the drain to provide an outlet for a proposed subdivision.

Several neighbouring landowners opposed the drain, arguing the appellant should bear the full cost.

The Tribunal found the proposed works were necessary and the engineer's report was sound.

The Tribunal ordered the municipality to adopt the report and pass a provisional by-law, allowing the drainage process to continue.

Drain Municipal Gauthier (RE), 2005 ONAFRAAT 9

Page 2 of 2 (24 cases)

appellant

Bruce MillsSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. D. (Jack) WilkinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lloyd PrinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter AalbersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rensje AalbersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wilma PrinsSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant and landowner

Harry BarclaySelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellants

Heather (Bobier) StirlingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark StirlingSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Robert KettlehutSelf-represented
1 appearance
Zephirin MenardSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed Landowner

Frank BuwaldaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Clerk of the Municipality

Brenda BruntAgent
1 appearance

Clerk of the Township

Brenda BruntAgent
1 appearance

counsel to Agricorp, the respondent

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Mr. Gauthier

Michael ChambersCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants, Gilbert Goyer and Green Acres Tech

Rodrigue EscayolaCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie BouchardCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Todd Suter

Mark MacKewCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, AGRICORP

Peter WechselmannCounsel
2 appearances

Drainage Superintendent for the Municipality

Don LewisAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the Township

Don LewisAgent
1 appearance

engineer for the municipality

Kenn SmartAgent
1 appearance

Engineer responsible for the Report

John StidwillAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the Report

John StidwillAgent
1 appearance

for Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Karin RasmussenCounsel
1 appearance
Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

for herself and Eckro Precision

Terry EckertSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Jay MaxnerSelf-represented
1 appearance
William YoungSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and Robert and Annette Anderson

Bruce ChrustieSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant

Robbie KiwanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Don GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Brian HamiltonAgent
1 appearance
Matthew DickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rick GrimaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant, Dairyland

Nancy ReidAgent
1 appearance
Bill ReidAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Leeds Belrock Farm Ltd.

Robert RinfretAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

John D. HoltropSelf-represented
1 appearance
John HoltropSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Ottawa

Cathy CrosbyCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Fred ThomsonAgent
2 appearances
Fred ThompsonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Agricorp

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance
Fred ThompsonAgent
1 appearance
Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Dave NolanAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Turkey Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of Fort Erie

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Champlain

Robert LefebvreAgent
1 appearance

for the UCFO

Marc LaflècheAgent
1 appearance
Pierre GlaudeAgent
1 appearance
Simon DurandAgent
1 appearance

Landowner

David DouglasSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent

John BarkovicAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Respondent

Ben GeigerAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’appelant, Place Riviera Place Inc.

Michael ChambersAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’intimé, le canton de Champlain

Robert TolhurstAgent
1 appearance

representative of the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

representing the appellant, Ledgecroft Farms Inc.

Jennifer GreenAgent
1 appearance
William (Ben) GreenAgent
1 appearance

representing the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

witness for the municipality

Don LackoAgent
1 appearance

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.2

cases/mo

OAFRAAT24(100%)

Decision types

appeal

trial

Page 2 of 2 (24 cases)