David D’Intino

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition.

The accused, who has treatment-resistant schizophrenia and a substance use disorder, was previously found not criminally responsible for sexual assault and indecent acts.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to the safety of the public.

The Board ordered a continued detention order with permission to reside in the community in approved accommodation, with minor amendments to conditions regarding cannabis and alcohol access.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for assault with a weapon and dangerous operation of a motor vehicle.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia, had been stable, compliant with medication, and abstinent from substances over the past year.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his history of non-adherence to treatment and risk factors.

The Board ordered the maintenance of the detention order with expanded privileges, including international travel and moderate alcohol consumption, to facilitate his transition to independent living.

The accused was previously found not criminally responsible for assault and uttering threats.

At her annual review hearing before the Ontario Review Board, the Board considered whether she continued to pose a significant threat to the safety of the public.

The evidence indicated that she suffers from schizoaffective disorder, lacks insight into her illness, and requires a highly supported environment to manage her medication and risk of violence.

The Board found that she continues to represent a significant threat to public safety and ordered the continuation of her current Detention Order at the forensic hospital.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for harassment.

The accused, diagnosed with chronic relapsing schizophrenia, sought an absolute discharge.

The hospital and the Attorney General recommended a conditional discharge, citing the accused's history of discontinuing medication and decompensating when previously granted an absolute discharge, as well as his recent disengagement from treatment.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety and ordered a conditional discharge with monthly reporting as the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.